Many agreements to liberalize trade in services tend to be limited in scope. This is a puzzle considering the high share of services in total employment and value added and relatively high barriers to trade in services in many countries. In this paper we argue that neglected complementarities between services trade policies and domestic regulation may help to understand the limited ambition on services observed in many trade agreements. We show that the productivity effects of services trade liberalization are conditional on regulatory quality. Our findings suggest that greater effort to design trade agreements with a view to improving regulatory quality may be a necessary condition for deepening the services coverage of trade agreements and will enhance the welfare gains from services trade liberalization.
Global Policy Volume 9 . Issue 4 . November 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12583
Disclaimer
Please note that linked content may only work for subscribers who have access either using a log-in and password or associated with their IP Address.
No other access is implied or intended.
If you find anything you consider should not be available, even in this limited form, please leave a comment below.